Quantcast Maroon News
College Media Network

Reckless Rhetoric

Matt Oja

Issue date: 1/28/05 Section: Commentary
Who says a strong central theme is integral to any good column? I've got a few ideas in mind that are worth discussing; none, though, merits its own full column. So bear with me while I ramble this week.
Snow removal around these parts really leaves something to be desired. The idea of shoveling or plowing, I think, is to scrape the pavement bare of snow. A sidewalk covered with two inches of slush isn't any better than a sidewalk with half a foot of fresh snow. Very few people (with the notable exception of "Cooking With" Tom, who puts some serious effort into keeping his sidewalk clean) seem to grasp this idea. I'm not tryin' to pull a muscle walking around this campus. Maybe those tree-trimmers we've seen around campus could be better used elsewhere.
Speaking of snow, why did I see a snowmobile flying across Whitnall Field yesterday? And (running the risk of alienating some people ... hopefully peers and not professors) do I even need a punchline here? I mean, let's be serious ... snowmobiling? Who does that? Gotta be the same demographic that Pabst Blue Ribbon and NASCAR cater to.
Speaking of that type of person, let's get some reader feedback on an interesting social situation. When a rambunctious, aggressive female accuses you of "talking like a girl" and you respond by saying she sounds like a dude, is it OK for her to get hyped at you? My feeling is that any insults can be returned in similar fashion without any negative repercussions. Evidently some differ on this issue. And when is it appropriate to make fun of someone for hooking up with "that guy/girl?" Again, there are some who seem to think such comments aren't fair game. Whatever happened to that old eye for an eye adage?
Kinda surprised by some (most) of the reactions to last week's column on the inauguration spending. A few liked it. Some thought it was boring (can't argue with that). Predictably, but at the same time curiously, a good handful disagreed with me. One reader found fault with my claim that $40 million was spent on the inauguration; seems to me that I stole that number from the January 1 edition of the New York Times. Take it up with them.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Advertisement

Advertisement