College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Sexploitation at Colgate

By Thomas Hedges

Class of 2012

|

Published: Friday, January 22, 2010

Updated: Friday, January 22, 2010

Colgate’s social atmosphere, in and even out of fraternities, has reduced many relationships between men and women to one devoid of human tenderness, commitment and compassion. This social scene, where women and men are little more than bodies, reinforces rigid gender roles. It feeds a cult of masculinity. Men become predators. Women become the prey. Men in this culture are qualified only to manage the company of men. Women manage the company of women.

This bifurcation of the campus along rigid and defined gender lines creates two groups with pre-established identities. When men and women come together in a social setting the encounter is usually dominated by the drunken “hook-up.” These “hook-ups” rarely lead to sustained relationships. And those who do not engage in this distorted behavior, who refuse to abide by these social rules, become outsiders.

Difference is not permitted. How does the gay man feel among his brothers? How does a lesbian feel among her sisters? How does a woman, who finds certain social outings demeaning, stand up to the men facilitating the event walk out? Where do those who want something more than a drunken one night stand
find space?

All institutions bear the scars of their history. Colgate, unlike colleges such as Bates or Oberlin, was very late to admit Jews, Blacks and women. Presidents of Colgate once openly denigrated these gender or ethnic groups. There is a powerful block of alumni who remember and at some level embrace this discrimination. They act as a dead weight on those who advocate reform and equality. We have, however, come a long way since the days of George Cutten. His crude racism and sexism is now considered impolite. But the labeling and the conformity to a white, male culture continues to poison
the campus.

Colgate is an inhospitable place to women and men who refuse to conform to these defined roles. People of color, those on scholarship, those within the LGBT community or those deeply sickened by the social scene can speak more eloquently than I to the subtle and overt forms of discrimination they endure. The pressure to be promiscuous, to “explore” sexuality and omit love, as well as to be pretty, or at least pretty as defined by the standards of a Connecticut prep school, makes Colgate very stifling for those who do not wish
to conform.

The Campus Climate Survey (CCLS) of 2009, for these reasons, found that more than 75 percent of women at Colgate had experienced sexist hostility. One in seven women had experienced sexual assault, which is defined as oral, vaginal or anal penetration without consent. These are numbers you might expect to find in some failed backwater where the rule of law did not exist.

“Colgate is male dominated,” said a woman in the sophomore class and a sorority member, who asked that I not use her name. “The men control the hook-up culture. The guys have the power to change it to a dating culture. But they choose
not to.”

The CCLS found that “women are much less happy with the dating and hook-up culture than men,” and that “women report feeling more pressure to drink.” The female student added that the social scene at Colgate “wouldn’t last at a school
like Wesleyan.”

Physical appearance becomes, in this culture, paramount. One in four women admitted to “thinking about body image and food to the extent that it affects their daily moods.”
Almost 20 percent “compensate for eating ‘bad’ foods by purging or doing extra exercise.” Only one-third of Colgate students report being in a relationship. I suspect that for long-term couples this figure is much lower.

“I think that boys deep down want a relationship,” the sorority sister continued. “I’ve known plenty of guys that hook-up with a girl and their friends ask ‘oooh, is she your girlfriend?’ I think that the other kids are a little jealous, and look to make their friend feel embarrassed about it.”

Any measure of a community, of its capacity for justice, tolerance and compassion, is determined by how those who are different are treated. Privileged white male chauvinism, which runs deep in this school’s veins, continues to make Colgate a place where only a certain type of woman and a certain type of man is considered worthy of respect. And this, at a moment in our lives when we should discover our individuality, leaves us as stunted as the alumni who work to keep Colgate frozen in a time warp.

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

35 comments

Women of Colgate
Sun Feb 7 2010 12:38
shut the f*** up Hedges. We're doing just fine. now stop staying in on friday nights playing tug of war with your little buddy and go have some fun.
Leon Black
Thu Feb 4 2010 18:57
bifurcation? this is a newspaper, not a biology lab dude...okay so you have good technical writing skills...pick a topic that actually makes you smile and write rationally without generalizations and biased quotes...figure it out
Anonymous
Sun Jan 31 2010 22:28
I agree with you. Mostly. But you offer no fixes, you kinda just whine about it. How about suggesting a more sober meeting place. Trying to socialize at Colgate unfortunately requires drinking--okay so offer a solution. Then your sex/race comments are just wrong. Try blaming the women a little more.
Your name
Thu Jan 28 2010 16:34
Every time I read a piece by Mr. Hedges, I no longer feel sad about having graduated. If I had to listen to him whine and bullshit about how much he hates Colgate every time I saw him out at night, I'd fill his transfer forms out for him.

I know plenty of individuals that went to Colgate looking for relationships, found them, and are still happily with that person today. Many of these individuals were members (and presidents) of fraternities, but we already know Mr. Hedges' ill-founded thoughts on that subject. You suggest 1/3 of all Colgate students are in relationships. That's news to me, but don't you think that's pretty impressive? Especially considering all the hostility and return to Pleasantville hokum pokum you are preaching?

Further, to suggest that men are predators and females are prey is insulting and barbaric. I would submit that perhaps roughly 70% of my hook-ups at Colgate were due not to my "predatory" status, but to sheer appeasement of the girl who was "preying" on me. This isn't a one way street, sir. Girls can, and are more than happy to, take the aggressive role when they are out at night looking for a good time. Sure, many girls may be fond of the notion of "bringing back the date", but I guarantee 95% of those same ladies can be found on a Wednesday, Thursday, Friday or Saturday evening drinking at some fraternity party or dancing at the jug looking to hook-up. You further this by suggesting that girls report being called derogatory names. Were they called that in earnest or in jest? By their friends or by someone they don't know? There's a serious difference there, sir, and I would bet a great deal that the misogynistic ways are far from the level you suggest. Indeed, I can't tell you how many girls I know that go around calling each other sluts and whores. There is an entire Facebook group called "Jug Whores" that preaches going to the jug, getting drunk, and hooking up (all while being proud of it)!

Lastly, I'm not entirely certain what (1) the past practices of excluding minorities, (2) being a person of color, (3) being LGBTQ, and (4) being on scholarship have ANYTHING to do with people having less one-night-stands and having more dates. I'm pretty sure groups 2-4 are fully capable both of being promiscuous and going on dates, but it might just be the collar of my polo shit getting in the way of my thinking.

Everyone gets it... you don't like the atmosphere at Colgate. Please stop writing about how much you hate it, and try to have a little fun. Who knows, you might actually enjoy yourself.

You made me transfer
Wed Jan 27 2010 23:13
Most of you make me sick. Which is why I'm leaving this school. Hook-up culture is disgusting. This article is just about dead on. You complain about the generalizations...and I admit, stereotyping isn't fair in most cases...but in this case I find it to be the case a majority of the time. There's so little compassion, commitment and devotion. Those that experience it are basically alienated from Colgate's society. Everything is superficial, based on good looks, preppiness, and arrogance. The nice guy fails to win here. This has a very high happiness rating because it is lacking such diversity and all the people that are attracted here are one type of person, and find other people of that classification. Those who aren't that way either transfer due to misery, like me, or stick with their respective minorities to try to find happiness and still end up unhappy so often. The Campus Climate Survey doesn't lie. Look at the statistics. I don't think this will change with so many people in denial.
The Realist
Wed Jan 27 2010 00:14
Hedges' point of view is completely founded and legitimate. He does not make broad generalizations or perpetuate falsehood; rather he meshes his opinions with real interviews from people who are close to and have a real connection with the subject matter. He also bases many of his claims rightly on actual data from the Campus Climate Survey that support his arguments, both in this article and his other about Greek life. Hedges isnt making anything up: It's all in that survey. If it weren't true, an overwhelming majority of students wouldn't have expressed their dissatisfaction with the dating culture and we wouldnt see the gap in satisfaction between Greeks and non-Greeks. That is good journalism, much more interesting and thought-provoking than many articles one sees in college newspapers such as this one that merely report mundane facts and opinions that I'm pretty sure everyone agreed on before the publication, eliciting little more than a "ho-hum" from the reader.

Also, the censorship on this piece was completely uncalled for and really shows what this school's priorities are. And before you say it, no, I do not hate Colgate, and I do not believe Hedges does either. On the contrary, people that feel the way I do love it so much we'd like to see the best for it, and that is just what Hedges is doing in articles in which he explains what he feels is wrong with the school, so that we may improve and become a better community overall.

Why is this not clear?
Sun Jan 24 2010 04:55
Dear "Maroon News r u serious?",

You credit the "scandalous" or immature behavior of America's youth to MTV. You feel the author's view on society is "skewed" and "myopic". You state the author's view on society is students enjoy relaxation and exploration of their young age. Your advice is to do a study on the connection between "random 'hook-ups'" in college and middle age marriage success.

Colgate 2009
Sat Jan 23 2010 10:23
While I realize this article is a commentary piece, I would be shocked if the Maroon News were to publish (or if the moderator would even allow this post to contribute to the discussion) a commentary claiming that most Middle Eastern men were terrorists who want to murder innocent civilians to reach their orgy with virgins in heaven, or all African Americans were thugs carrying guns to hold up 7-11s. As a recent alumnus I can attest that Mr. Hedges claims are way off base, unless all hell broke loose in Hamilton after Rebecca Chopp's departure (I find this scenario highly unlikely). This is the second slanderous piece I have seen from Mr. Hedges, and I would prefer to not see a third. These baseless claims and generalizations taken straight from your run-of-the-mill low budget college movie are deeply offensive to thousands of Colgate alumni who love the school and feel the campus environment has contributed far more to our "real world" success, whether through social skills or networking with alumni, than any English class teaching us the meaning of "bifurcation." Without delving into personal attacks, perhaps Mr. Hedges would be well-served transferring to another university where the campus culture fits more neatly into his utopian vision-although I suspect he would once again be disappointed.
Betsy
Sat Jan 23 2010 00:06
I'd like to preface my comment by making clear that I am not a Colgate student or alum; this piece was sent to me through an incredulous friend and after reading it, I can't help but feel compelled to give my two cents. It's worth noting that in high school I was the president of my Gay Straight Alliance and I seriously doubt anyone would describe me as anything less than a feminist. That said, I find your article completely out of touch with the real world and, frankly, it makes me wonder how much experience you have beyond whatever small, liberal town from which you hail and your apparent unsavory personal experiences on the Colgate campus. I went to a slightly larger, similarly ranked New England university, and my experience was largely the same. I subsequently moved to the west coast, and there, too, my experience mirrors that in your article. Welcome to being a young adult in America. This isn't 1954, and while you apparently find this shocking, nobody college aged, women included, wants to cash in their personal freedoms for a left hand ring and joint checking. In fact, if you had done any research prior to writing your painfully biased article, you would know that several forefront publications, including The New York Times, have written similar pieces about the evolution of dating and how in this day and age, the "hook up" is the most prevalent form of so-called courting. And, this might be another proverbial earthquake headed your way so brace yourself, but not one of these articles made even mere mention of Colgate. Hate it as you may, but learn that your experience is nothing noteworthy or special. It's just the way it is. It is perhaps unfortunate that so many of the comments are written with such hasty hatred, because I'm sure this does nothing but make you feel righteous and vindicated. But please, take it from an objective source, you need to gain a lot of perspective and experience before you assassinate the character of your alma mater and fellow students. People will not view you as enlightened or forward thinking, but rather, close minded and embittered.
Maroon News r u serious?
Fri Jan 22 2010 23:49
Your sheer ignorance is astounding. You write as if you're some sort of alien judging the human race. Take out "Colgate," substitute "society," and the article has the same message: Thomas hates modern American culture. The fact that you are surprised and appalled by Colgate students' behavior means that you have an extremely myopic and skewed view of our society. Were you home-schooled or not allowed to watch scandalous networks like MTV? Get with it. Your hateful diatribe reveals nothing but your own misunderstanding of how young people relax and explore their youth. You should do a study on how many people have random hook-ups in college, and then successfully date and marry once a little more mature and able to commit to a real relationship. Write something worth reading, or keep it scribbled in your hate-tear covered journal.
the feminist
Fri Jan 22 2010 21:42
This is a student's newspapers and I find it interesting to read different views about the school. If you agree with Thomas, nice. If you don't, show your respect and discuss about the problem. All of your hate comments make this article more believable to outsiders.
peace
Your name
Fri Jan 22 2010 19:21
To "Concerned Alum"- it is not really fair to blame the Maroon News for publishing this piece. Although I do not agree with Thomas's viewpoint, denying the publication of this article would be akin to censorship, especially since it was published in the commentary section. Also, underneath Thomas's previous article regarding the negativities of Greek life was a second article stating the benefits of the Greek presence on Colgate's campus.
Steve Testa
Fri Jan 22 2010 17:57
Get a clue. Transfer. If I had gone to Swathmore, Weslyn, Williams etc and didn't "like" the environment I wouldn't sit around writing articles and moan about what a terrible place it was cause there were no fraternities or parties or girls who just wanted a night of drunken debauchery. I'd get out of there. It's called culture bro. I don't know one person, not one, from college who went to Colgate all 4 years who didn't end up loving it, and honestly it was for a lot of the reasons you mention. So get a clue, "we", the alumni who donate, give back, create a social network post graduation in various places around the world love the school. If you don't like it leave. I'm sure there's a ton of other schools who would love to have a writer of your caliber. God knows I don't want to run into you in the real world and people tell me that this loser they know went to Colgate. Don't tarnish the degree for everyone else.
Benjamin PIATT Runkle
Fri Jan 22 2010 17:29
Hedgie why don't you transfer to Wesleyan or maybe Hogwarts. "Bifurcation" give me a break dude.
Big Norm
Fri Jan 22 2010 17:26
hey just because i'm dead doesn't mean you can just delete my input on this forum. my corpse alone weighs at least 1,500 lbs., add my soul to that and we're talking two, maybe three thousand pounds of bacon, baby. i'm a large constituent.
J.P. Prewitt
Fri Jan 22 2010 17:23
earth to the maroon news moderator....stop taking down hilarious comments. You allow this terrible article to be posted and then censor the only part worth reading! Come on maaaan!
One of the Brian Kennedy's
Fri Jan 22 2010 17:22
Tom,
Does it make you feel accomplished that you are the only male to ever take every women's studies course at Colgate?
Annoyed Alumnus
Fri Jan 22 2010 17:16
What a cop out by the girl who quoted in the article. "Men have the power to change to a dating culture," yea right. If women had the desire or self-control, there couldn't be a hook-up culture. It takes two to tango.

Also, I don't see how it's relevant at all that Colgate use to no allow minorities. I'm sure at some point, assuming the writer of this article is white, his ancestors owned slaves. Is that relevant? Absolutely not. I don't understand this persons obsession with looking back instead of forward, it's both juvenile and counter-productive.

Jeff Herbst
Fri Jan 22 2010 17:16
thomas, is it dark and cold in your father's shadow?
PETA
Fri Jan 22 2010 17:14
Who killed the Big Norm comment?






log out